Author: Andrew Kern

  The United States pays more for healthcare than any country in the world. But why? The answer isn’t that simple. Have you ever seen someone claim universal healthcare would actually save Americans money? There may be some truth to it. According to a review of 22 studies, most of them concluded a single-payer healthcare

Often, people lament that if only the masses were educated, motivated, and had forced politicians to follow the Constitution, the government could have been restrained to its rightful role of upholding liberty.

Many (if not all) countries which are typically said to have universal healthcare, do not meet WHO's criteria.

First of all, confront the reality that your vote does not matter.

A number of years ago there was an interesting back and forth among libertarian scholars on the feasibility of free market anarchism — a society where law (security and arbitration) is provided entirely by private agencies.

Repeatedly, I encounter libertarians who think the state should simply protect our rights.

The results are similar to past findings. Immigrants tend to consume less in total dollars, 21% less according to this report. But why do some other organizations consistently find different results?

I recently stumbled onto a critique of Anarcho-capitalism by the Objectivist, Harry Binswanger. Being a libertarian anarchist myself, I was curious of his arguments. Ultimately, I was disappointed.

There is this pervasive myth that if a firm's workers are recieving welfare, it amounts to a subsidy for the firm since it can then pay its workers less. This is absurd.

Dave Smith recently took the time to respond to my last article, which was a reply to a prior episode where he discussed immigration.